Beverly Hills, CaliforniaMonday–Friday · 10am–5pm
California State Bar #81160 · Active323-655-0961

Home/ Cases & Articles/ Patrick Flannery v. Andrea Murray and American Contractors

Business / Property Litigation · Result Sept. 6, 2017

Patrick Flannery v. Andrea Murray and American Contractors

Client-supplied case materials describe a dispute over a jointly owned horse-boarding ranch in which the defense prevailed on Flannery’s claims and Andrea Murray obtained $163,479 on an accounting cross-claim.

Full Case Article

Full article & case record

Facts

Plaintiff Patrick Flannery filed suit against defendant Andrea Murray in relation to a horse boarding business owned by Flannery and Murray.

Murray filed a cross-claim for losses related to the business.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF’S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed that Murray wrongfully ousted him from his own ranch for approximately four years by obtaining several domestic violence and civil restraining orders against him. The ranch had a horse boarding business and Flannery claimed that Murray had him ousted so she could abscond with four years of profits.

DEFENDANTS’ CONTENTIONS: Defendant claimed the ranch was owned 50/50 by way of an earlier palimony judgment.

Murray’s cross-claim was for an accounting contending that there were losses of $326,958 in the horse boarding business, and that as a 50/50 partner, that Flannery was responsible for 50 percent of those losses, which totaled $163,479.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded 75 percent of the ranch in exchange for the dismissal of the action. Defendant offered to give plaintiff 62.5 percent (approximately $200,000) in exchange for the dismissal of the action, and plaintiff would give up his right to an appeal in the palimony case (worth $1.2 million dollars), and plaintiff would give up his right to claim damages for waste on the property worth $500,000.

Damages

Flannery’s claim at trial was that Murray owed him profits and one-half the value of the business. His aggregate claim was for $1,650,000. Flannery further claimed that Murray breached her fiduciary duties and he sought imposition of a constructive trust and unjust enrichment.

Result

In the first phase of trial, the jury found in favor of Murray and ordered the ranch sold through partition. In the second phase of trial, the jury rendered a defense verdict on all claims. The jury also found in favor of Murray on her cross-claim for an accounting and awarded $163,479, subject to the trial court’s own determination as to her equitable claim. In the third phase of trial, the court found in favor of defendants Murray and American Contractors on claims of imposition of a constructive trust and surety claim.

Source & publication note

This page uses the fullest client-supplied article or case material available in the website packet. Where an original publication or public opinion is available, the source link is provided for independent reference. Any supplied excerpt that begins or ends mid-article is identified as an excerpt.

Consultation

Have a matter you would like the office to review?

Contact The Law Offices of Philip Kaufler in Beverly Hills.

Request Consultation